Why Organisations take the failure path knowing fully well it is not the right path!

Organizations often act against their own best interests, knowingly heading towards failure. There are several psychological and systemic reasons behind this paradox:

  1. Cognitive Biases: Humans are prone to biases like confirmation bias (seeking information that confirms existing beliefs) or optimism bias (underestimating risks). Decision-makers within organizations might fall victim to these biases, leading them to believe their actions are justified despite contrary evidence.
  2. Groupthink and Culture: Organizational cultures can foster groupthink, where dissenting opinions are discouraged. This conformity can blind decision-makers to alternative viewpoints, leading to actions that go against best practices.
  3. Incentives and Metrics: Metrics or incentives often prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. Employees might chase these immediate rewards, disregarding potential long-term consequences.
  4. Hierarchy and Communication: Hierarchical structures can hinder open communication. Lower-level employees might spot potential issues, but the hierarchical setup might discourage them from voicing concerns to higher-ups.
  5. Pressure and Fear of Change: Fear of change or disruptive ideas can push organizations to stick to familiar, albeit flawed, methods. Change might be seen as risky, leading to inertia in adopting better practices.
  6. Overconfidence and Hubris: Decision-makers might overestimate their capabilities or believe they’re immune to failure due to past successes, leading to risky decisions.

These factors intertwine, creating a complex web that steers organizations towards actions that contradict their best interests. Addressing these underlying causes involves fostering a culture of open communication, challenging biases, aligning incentives with long-term goals, and encouraging a healthy acceptance of change and constructive criticism. Understanding these dynamics can help organizations navigate away from self-destructive paths.

“Nine Factors of Failure.” Here they are:

  1. Complexity: The more complex a system, the higher the likelihood of errors or failures.
  2. Interconnectedness: Systems within an organization are interconnected. A failure in one area can have cascading effects on others.
  3. Goals and Values: Misaligned goals and values can lead to decisions that compromise safety and ethics.
  4. Failure to Learn: Organizations that don’t learn from past mistakes are prone to repeating them.
  5. Production Pressures: When production deadlines or targets take precedence over safety, it can lead to compromises.
  6. Complacency: Long periods of success can breed complacency, leading to overlooking potential risks.
  7. Complexity of Work: Some tasks or processes might be inherently complex, increasing the chance of errors or failures.
  8. Requisite Variety: When the variety of risks is not adequately matched with the variety of defenses, failures can occur.
  9. Lack of Resilience: Organizations that lack resilience struggle to recover from failures effectively.

Each factor contributes uniquely to the potential for failure and needs to be addressed systematically.

Diving Deep in to Todd Conklin’s perspective he lists 9 key domain which leads to delibrate failures knowing fully well that it is not a right path. He talks about below in his podcast, We can observe:

  1. Ignorance of Present Danger: Sometimes, individuals or organizations fail to perceive imminent risks due to a lack of awareness or a misplaced sense of security, ultimately leading to disaster.
  2. Sense of Immunity: There’s this belief that failure won’t affect them personally or the organization they belong to, creating a false sense of invincibility that blinds them to potential risks.
  3. Impulsive Behavior: Rushing into decisions without considering potential dangers due to the adrenaline rush or pressure can lead to overlooking critical warning signs.
  4. Fear of Bad News: A culture that penalizes messengers of bad news discourages open communication about potential failures, perpetuating a culture of silence and ignorance.
  5. Overreliance on Gut Feeling: Trusting intuition over rational analysis, as Daniel Kahneman describes, might lead to decisions based on biases or incomplete information, disregarding potential risks.
  6. Selective Memory and Optimism: Forgetting past failures or being overly optimistic about outcomes can lead to the repetition of history, with organizations falling into the same pitfalls.
  7. Lack of Accountability: When actions lack consequences, even negative practices become normalized, perpetuating a cycle of failure without repercussions.
  8. Normalization of Mediocrity: Defending the status quo without recognizing its flaws prevents progress and improvement, leading to stagnation and potential failure.
  9. Avoidance of Disruption: Fear of standing out or causing disruption leads to failures being overlooked or deliberately accepted as part of the norm, rather than addressing them.

Immunizing organizations against deliberate failures involves a multifaceted approach targeting culture, processes, and mindset. Here are actionable steps:

  1. Promote a Culture of Openness: Encourage open communication where bad news can be shared without fear of repercussions. Leaders should actively listen and appreciate honesty.
  2. Encourage Constructive Dissent: Create platforms for employees to voice concerns or alternative viewpoints without judgment. Embrace diversity of thought to identify blind spots.
  3. Focus on Learning from Failures: Foster a culture that views failures as learning opportunities. Analyze failures systematically to extract lessons and prevent their recurrence.
  4. Establish Clear Accountability: Ensure that individuals and teams are accountable for their actions. Consequences for negligence or ethical breaches should be clear and consistent.
  5. Prioritize Long-Term Goals: Align incentives and metrics with long-term sustainability rather than short-term gains. Ensure that safety and ethical considerations aren’t sacrificed for immediate benefits.
  6. Enhance Risk Perception: Educate employees about risk perception and provide tools to assess risks objectively. This helps in making informed decisions.
  7. Continuous Improvement: Implement mechanisms for continuous improvement. Regularly review and update processes, incorporating best practices and innovative solutions.
  8. Leadership Commitment: Leaders must lead by example, displaying a commitment to safety, ethical practices, and continuous improvement. Their actions set the tone for the entire organization.
  9. Invest in Training and Development: Equip employees with the skills and knowledge needed to identify, prevent, and manage risks effectively.
  10. Challenge the Status Quo: Encourage a healthy skepticism toward norms. Encourage employees to question existing practices and propose better alternatives.

By integrating these strategies into the organizational fabric, companies can fortify themselves against deliberate failures. It’s about nurturing a culture of transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement that prioritizes long-term success over short-term gains.

Karthik

Bangalore 18/12/23.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Karthik B; Orion Transcenders. Bangalore.

Lives in Bangalore. HESS Professional of 35+ yrs experience. Global Exposure in 4 continents of over 22 years in implementation of Health, Environment, Safety, Sustainability. First batch of Environmental Engineers from 1985 Batch. Qualified for implementing Lean, 6Sigma, HR best practices integrating them in to HESS as value add to business.

Leave a comment