Behavioural Observations (BO) Done Right: A Prerequisite for Safety Excellence

#249

Introduction
Behavioural Observations (BO) have become a widely used tool in safety programs across industries. However, in organisations where people skills, competence, engineering excellence, and safety culture are at a low maturity level, BO is often used as a ‘quick fix’ rather than a well-integrated solution. This misapplication leads to misinterpretations, ineffective implementation, and in some cases, counterproductive results. This blog explores how BO should be applied correctly and why its success depends on the foundational maturity of an organisation’s safety ecosystem.

Misconceptions About Behavioural Observations
In immature safety cultures, Behavioural Observation is mistakenly seen as a panacea for all safety issues. Often, organisations try to implement BO without addressing the essential prerequisites such as risk compliance, competency development, engineering excellence, and systematic training plans. Without these, BO becomes a mere fault-finding exercise rather than a constructive safety enhancement tool.

One major flaw in such organisations is the confusion between condition monitoring and behavioural observation. A classic example is an employee working on an electrical panel while standing on a wet floor. The wet floor is a hazardous condition, not a behavioural failure. However, in low-maturity organisations, such unsafe conditions are often attributed to employee behaviour, leading to misplaced blame and ineffective corrective actions.

The Ratio of Safe to At-Risk Behaviours: A Key Indicator of Maturity
A mature BO system should identify and promote safe behaviours rather than focus excessively on at-risk actions. In organisations with low safety maturity, the ratio of safe to at-risk behaviours often skews to 1:3 (for every safe act, three unsafe acts are recorded). This reflects a ‘GOTCHA!’ culture—where employees feel they are being watched to catch mistakes rather than being guided to improve. A high-performing organisation, on the other hand, should aim for a 3:1 ratio, where positive reinforcements significantly outweigh negative feedback.

Why Pre-Requisites Matter for Effective Behavioural Observation
For BO to drive meaningful improvements, it must be implemented only after essential safety pillars are well-established. These include:

1. Risk Compliance: Safety regulations and risk management systems should be well-integrated and consistently followed.
2. Competency Maturity: Employees should have the required knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform their tasks safely.
3. Systemic Flow & Stability: Safety processes should be embedded in daily operations, ensuring smooth implementation.
4. Engineering Excellence: Equipment design, maintenance, and workplace layout must be optimised to reduce risk at the source.
5. Training & Development: Effective training programs should be designed based on identified needs, ensuring participation and application of learnings.

Without these pillars, BO leads to confusion, frustration, and emotional misalignment among employees, ultimately driving disengagement and resistance to safety initiatives.

The Right Approach to Behavioural Observations
To make BO an enabler rather than a source of heartburn, organisations must:

• Shift from fault-finding to positive reinforcement: Recognise and appreciate safe behaviours before addressing areas of improvement.
• Train observers thoroughly: Ensure those conducting BO understand how to differentiate between conditions and behaviours.
• Align BO with overall safety strategy: It should complement engineering controls and procedural compliance rather than replace them.
• Ensure leadership commitment: Managers should model the right behaviours and actively participate in observation programs.
• Use data effectively: Analysis of BO data should lead to systemic improvements rather than superficial quick fixes.

Conclusion
Behavioural Observations, when implemented correctly, are a powerful tool to enhance safety culture. However, they should never be used as a standalone solution or a substitute for fundamental safety systems. Organisations must first establish a solid foundation in risk management, competency development, engineering controls, and systematic training. Only then can BO be effectively utilised to drive safety excellence.

When done right, BO transforms from a “Gotcha!” system into a “Guiding and Growing” mechanism that fosters trust, engagement, and sustained safety improvements.

---

Do you agree that BO is often misapplied in organisations? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments!

Karthik

25/2/25 11am.