Why EHS Change Fails in 2025: A Perfect Storm of Apathy, Misalignment, and Mediocrity

#262

Introduction
It’s no secret that the landscape of workplace safety and environmental health has evolved dramatically over the past 30 years. Back then, safety initiatives were championed by passionate leaders and implemented by teams committed to long-term excellence. Today, however, a mix of short attention spans, fragmented leadership, cultural missteps, technological reluctance, and a changing social fabric has created a perfect storm where EHS initiatives struggle to deliver meaningful change. In this post, I’ll explore why the modern workplace is less conducive to safety improvements and what can be done to reverse this trend.


1. The Generational Chasm: Bite-Sized Attention and Information Overload

Modern employees, especially the younger cohorts, have grown up in a world of rapid-fire information and fleeting digital interactions. Their attention spans, often measured in mere seconds, are a natural by-product of constant connectivity. This isn’t a failing on their part—it’s a reflection of our era. However, the traditional methods of conveying critical EHS information, such as lengthy sessions and dense manuals, simply don’t cut it anymore. We need to innovate our communication methods, embracing microlearning and mobile-friendly formats that deliver safety messages in an instant.

Counter Perspective:
There’s a flip side. Today’s workforce is also more receptive to feedback and inclusive narratives. When safety is framed as a purpose-driven mission—protecting lives and ensuring well-being—it can capture the imagination of even the most distracted minds.


2. Leadership Drift: The Demise of Long-Term Vision

In many organisations, leadership has shifted its focus to short-term metrics and immediate returns. The traditional “begin with the end in mind” mentality has been replaced by the pressure to deliver quarterly results. EHS, with its long-term payoff, is often sidelined unless a crisis forces its spotlight. Leaders find themselves caught between endless dashboards and the urgent demands of ESG and DEI initiatives, leaving little room for the enduring commitment that safety truly requires.

Counter Perspective:
It’s important to note that in some progressive companies, leaders recognise that robust safety practices are the foundation of operational excellence. When CEOs and senior managers model safety as part of their core strategy, the culture shifts—even if slowly. The challenge is to scale this mindset across all levels.


3. Culture Confusion: Trust, Empowerment, and Accountability on the Backburner

True safety culture isn’t built on policies alone; it is nurtured through trust, empowerment, and accountability. Unfortunately, today’s corporate culture often prioritises flashy software and quick fixes over these intangible yet critical elements. Leaders tend to rely on digital tools to measure performance, mistakenly equating them with true cultural change. When the ‘soft’ elements of mentorship, active listening, and continuous engagement are neglected, safety initiatives become mere checkboxes rather than a way of life.

Counter Perspective:
The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked a renewed focus on mental health and psychological safety. This presents a significant opportunity for organisations to integrate well-being with safety practices, creating a more holistic approach that benefits everyone.


4. Technology’s Illusion: SAP Modules Versus the Ubiquity of Excel

Despite the surge in technological advancements, many organisations remain stuck in the past when it comes to EHS software. It’s not uncommon to find companies investing heavily in ERP systems like SAP yet underutilising their EHS modules—often defaulting to old-school tools like Microsoft Excel. This resistance to modernising safety management is as much about cultural inertia as it is about the technology itself. EHS professionals need to not only demand better tools but also champion solutions that are user-friendly and tailored to the nuances of safety management.

Counter Perspective:
There’s a valid reason behind some of this reluctance. Poorly designed safety tech can become more of a hindrance than a help. The true path forward lies in developing empathetic technology solutions that enhance, rather than complicate, everyday safety practices.


5. The EHS Professional: From Change Agents to Boardroom Spectators

Many EHS professionals today seem content with merely securing a seat at the leadership table. While having a voice in strategic discussions is important, it is not enough. There’s a growing trend where EHS experts focus more on climbing the corporate ladder than on engaging with the people who form the backbone of organisational safety. This detachment results in a gap between leadership and the workforce, where vital safety messages are diluted or lost altogether.

Counter Perspective:
This is not a condemnation of all EHS professionals. The field is evolving, and some are successfully re-skilling to become effective communicators and change agents. The challenge remains to ensure that all professionals in the domain prioritise engagement over mere positional power.


6. The Social Dimension: Eroded Community and Mediocrity in Performance

Modern work environments are shaped by the pressures of the nuclear family, mental health struggles, and the constant comparisons facilitated by social media. These factors contribute to a task-focused rather than a community-focused approach. When the social fabric of the workplace is weakened, efforts to nurture a safety culture falter. In a climate where mediocre performance is tolerated because “there are bigger worries,” safety becomes a secondary concern—a casualty of broader societal challenges.

Counter Perspective:
There is a growing recognition of the importance of community and well-being in the workplace. Organisations that invest in building supportive, inclusive environments often find that enhanced employee morale leads to better safety outcomes. This suggests that with the right focus, even the social challenges of today can be turned into an opportunity for cultural reinvention.


Conclusion
The reality is stark—implementing effective EHS initiatives in 2025 is an uphill battle. The combination of a rapidly shifting generational mindset, disengaged leadership, misinterpreted cultural dynamics, and the technological gap has created a scenario where safety is often seen as an optional extra rather than a core value. Yet, this is not the end of the road. The counter perspectives indicate that there is potential for change if organisations can bridge the gap between old and new ways of working. As EHS professionals, we must adapt, re-skill, and reignite our passion for creating safe, healthy, and engaged workplaces. The future of EHS may be uncertain, but it remains in our hands—if we dare to lead the change.

Comments? Thoughts?
Karthik

31/3/25.

I will be away on travel until 12/4/25, so expect a lull…

Unknown's avatar

Author: Karthik B; Orion Transcenders. Bangalore.

Lives in Bangalore. HESS Professional of 35+ yrs experience. Global Exposure in 4 continents of over 22 years in implementation of Health, Environment, Safety, Sustainability. First batch of Environmental Engineers from 1985 Batch. Qualified for implementing Lean, 6Sigma, HR best practices integrating them in to HESS as value add to business.

Leave a comment