Health, Environment, Safety, Sustainability (HESS)

#261

Disclosure:- I am yet to come across an Indian site where this theme worked. I would therefore boldy include any level of maturity sites in India.

Safety sounds simple, right? Tell everyone on the shop floor they’re responsible for it, and boom—problem solved. Everyone looks out for each other, hazards get spotted, and incidents drop. Except, in reality, especially at manufacturing sites with low safety maturity, this well-meaning mantra can create more problems than it solves. Here’s why pushing “safety is everyone’s responsibility” too early might be a risky move—and what needs to come first.

1. The “Someone Else Will Handle It” Trap

Picture this: a group of workers is tackling a task with hidden hazards—say, a machine with a tricky lockout-tagout process or a cluttered walkway near heavy equipment. When everyone’s told they’re responsible for safety, it’s easy for some to assume someone else will step up. Diffusion of responsibility kicks in. No one wants to be the nag, and no one takes ownership. End result? That loose guardrail or unmarked spill stays ignored until it’s too late. In low-maturity sites, where proactive habits aren’t ingrained, this laissez-faire vibe can quietly brew at-risk situations.

2. Monkey See, Monkey Do—But With Hazards

Here’s another practical snag: people mimic what they see. If a site hasn’t done proper risk assessments—especially for unplanned or new activities—workers might copy whatever’s happening around them. Say a newbie sees a veteran skip a safety step because “it’s always been done this way.” Without clear guidance, that shortcut spreads like wildfire. In a low-maturity setup, where hazard awareness is shaky and documentation is spotty, this herd mentality can turn a small oversight into a full-blown incident. Everyone being “responsible” doesn’t help if no one knows what right looks like.

3. Supervisors Are the Linchpin, Not the Crowd

Let’s be real—hazardous situations on a manufacturing floor can shift fast. A chemical spill, a jammed conveyor, a power surge—these aren’t static problems. Supervisors, with their experience and bird’s-eye view, are best equipped to analyze what’s going on and call the shots. Expecting every worker to independently assess and act in chaotic, ever-changing conditions is a tall order, especially at sites where safety training is basic or inconsistent. Without that top-down clarity, “everyone’s responsible” just turns into “everyone’s guessing.”

4. It’s a Logistics Nightmare Without Maturity

Making safety a shared responsibility sounds noble, but it demands serious planning, coordination, and follow-through—stuff low-maturity sites often lack. You need solid communication channels, regular training, clear roles, and a culture that rewards vigilance. Without that backbone, the idea collapses under its own weight. Workers get confused, priorities clash, and safety becomes a buzzword instead of a practice. Low-maturity sites are still figuring out the basics—adding a complex, everyone-pitches-in approach is like handing a toddler a Rubik’s Cube.

5. The Missing Foundation: Systems and Engineering First

Here’s the kicker: safety doesn’t start with people—it starts with systems. A robust Safety Management System (SMS), built on engineering excellence and thorough risk assessments, is the real game-changer. Think proper machine guarding, well-mapped hazard controls, and legal compliance baked into the process. Only after that foundation is laid can you layer on the “everyone’s responsible” mindset. It’s like building a house—you don’t hang curtains before pouring the concrete. At low-maturity sites, jumping straight to shared responsibility skips the critical step of giving workers a safe environment to take ownership of.

The Path Forward: Maturity Before Mindset

So, what’s the fix? Start with the nuts and bolts—engineering controls, risk assessments, and a functioning SMS. Train supervisors to lead, not just react. Build a culture where safety isn’t a slogan but a habit, backed by clear processes. Once that maturity takes root, then you can roll out “safety is everyone’s responsibility” as the next step—not the starting line. It’s not about ditching the idea altogether; it’s about timing it right. Low-maturity sites need structure first, empowerment second.

Bonus Point: Accountability Gaps

One more thing to chew on: when everyone’s responsible, no one’s accountable. If an incident happens, who takes the hit? In a low-maturity site with fuzzy roles, it’s easy for blame to bounce around—or worse, get buried. A strong SMS ties accountability to specific actions and people, which keeps the system honest. Without that, the “everyone’s job” approach can erode trust and let sloppy habits slide.

What do you think? Comment below.

Karthik

28/3/25 1130am.

#260

Hey folks,Over the past 10 days, I’ve been on quarterly calls with my EHS buddies from across the globe—India, the US, Europe, you name it. And let me tell you, the mood’s pretty grim. There’s this nagging feeling that Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS), the good old EHS-I of the 1980s, is losing its shine. Back in the day, EHS pros were the unsung heroes, the engineers who kept factories humming and workers safe. But now? It’s like EHS-II—suit-clad MBAs, Lawyers, ESG buzzwords, and hype—has taken over, and the value we once brought to businesses is fading fast. Few of my very very senior friends are shying away from Sustainability / ESG folks like seeing a “LEPER”. So is this change Myth or reality? Let’s unpack this mess.

EHS-I vs EHS-II: The Respect That’s Vanished

Picture this: in the ’80s and ’90s, Senior EHS pros (mostly engineers) had a dotted line straight to the Chief Executive or CSO. If something went wrong—a spill, a fire, a worker hurt—they’d march into the boss’s office and get stuff sorted. Fatality means mandatory travel to Corporate HQ and face CEO’s traiblazer. ( I had faced twice- so I know what that feels!). Fast forward to 2025, and that’s a distant dream. My friends tell me that when an MNC reorganizes or an EHS veteran retires, the role gets downgraded—sometimes two levels down! No more CXO access, no more clout. Fatality is just a bad luck for the guy, I have many other things to worry about. (Pay the family handsomely, from Insurance) Instead, we’ve got MBAs and finance gurus calling the shots, people who wouldn’t know a safety valve from a pressure cooker. They sit in their swanky ivory towers, far from the dusty sites where the real action happens. Remember how leaders like DuPont’s old-school CEOs (He called himself Chief Safety Officer -First) used to walk the shop floor? Gone are those days.

The MBA Takeover and the Compliance Trap

Why’s this happening? Simple—cost pressures and a shift in priorities. Companies, even the big MNCs, don’t want excellence anymore; they’re happy with bare-minimum compliance. “Bas local laws follow karo, aur chup raho,” they say. Excellence costs money—training, audits, better equipment—and in 2025, it’s all about cutting corners. My EHS pals bet that even corporate heads don’t know their own guidelines. Imagine that! The guy at the top of the EHS ladder clueless about what’s expected. Meanwhile, CXOs play the “don’t know, don’t tell” game. If an incident happens—like BP Texas City in 2005 or DuPont’s La Porte/ Balle WV, in 2000s—now they find a scapegoat, fire them, and call it a day. Sad, that is true. They will be able to find a crime in the guy. (Lavrentiy Berria- met his match!).

The Ghost of Incidents Past

Let’s talk about those disasters. BP Texas City—15 dead, 180 injured. Why? Cost-cutting, ignored warnings, and a management too busy counting pennies to care about safety. DuPont Clearwater—toxic gas leak, one worker dead. Same story: neglected maintenance and a fancy corporate culture that forgot the basics. These weren’t just “accidents”; they were wake-up calls. But have we woken up? Nahin yaar, we’re still hitting snooze. In India, we might say, “Crow is black everywhere,” but that’s no excuse to roll over and accept it.

Why Are We Here? The Causes

So how did EHS go from a value-add to a back-bencher? First, the rise of the MBA brigade. Business schools churn out folks who think safety is just another spreadsheet. They’ve overshadowed the engineers who actually understand the nuts and bolts. Second, ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) hype has turned EHS into a PR stunt—greenwashing instead of real action. Third, globalization and cost pressures mean companies prioritize profits over people. And finally, leadership’s changed. The old guard visited sites, shook hands with workers. Today’s CXOs? They’re Zoom warriors, detached from the ground.

Is It Salvageable?

Here’s the big question: can we turn this around? Maybe, Karthik, maybe. My data from these calls isn’t hard stats—it’s vibes from pros worldwide—but it’s real enough to ring alarm bells. To fix this, companies need to bring back the engineer’s voice, not just the MBA’s. Invest in training, not just compliance. Make EHS a boardroom priority again, with direct CXO access. And for heaven’s sake, let’s ditch the scapegoat culture—learn from incidents, don’t bury them. But if cost-cutting stays king, and leaders keep hiding in their towers, EHS-II will keep winning, and we’ll all lose.

Or Am I Wrong?

Now, I could be off the mark. Maybe your company still respects EHS, and your CXO’s on speed dial. If so, lucky you! ( I highly doubt) But the chatter I’m hearing—from Mumbai to Albany, via London- Amsterdam—says this decline’s no myth. It’s a slow rot, and India’s no exception. We might laugh that “sab jagah ka kauwa kaala hai,” but it’s time we stop laughing and start acting. What do you think? Is EHS doomed, or can we bring back its glory days?

Please comment?
Karthik

24/3/25 1pm.

#259

Context:-I was on call with couple of American ex-colleagues,(EHS) who head Global Environmental Group for their organisation. (We catch up once in quarter, this time the topic was Sustainability). We all Drop it like a hot potato. Hence the blog how a genuine effort with good intention has been hijacked.

Sustainability is a word everyone hears these days—companies, governments, even NGOs throw it around like confetti. It’s supposed to mean saving the planet, cutting waste, and living responsibly. But for many, it’s turned into a big joke. People don’t see it as something that adds value. Instead, they see fake promises, flashy reports, and leaders who don’t care. Here’s why sustainability efforts have gone off track, with some Indian mess-ups to show how bad it can get.

Glossy Reports, No Real Work

Companies love showing off sustainability reports—thick, shiny booklets with pretty pictures and big promises like “carbon-neutral by 2050.” But where’s the action? Too often, these are just marketing tricks. Globally, H&M got caught in 2021 when a Changing Markets Foundation report said 96% of their “sustainable” claims for their “Conscious Collection” were fake. Closer home, Tata Power bragged about renewable energy in their reports, but in 2022, activists pointed out their coal plants were still chugging along, pumping out emissions. People laughed and said, “Report likha, kaam bhool gaye” (Wrote the report, forgot the work).

Run by Suits, Not Engineers

Sustainability needs people who know the ground—like environmental engineers who understand emissions or water systems. But who’s running the show? Corporate folks with MBAs and finance degrees, sitting in fancy offices, far from factories or villages. They make plans that sound good but don’t work. Look at Volkswagen—their “clean diesel” lie in 2015 was cooked up by execs, not engineers. They faked emissions tests, got caught by the US EPA, and paid billions in fines. In India, Hindustan Unilever (HUL) pushed “sustainable living” but got flak in 2020 when their Kodaikanal plant’s old mercury mess still wasn’t fully cleaned up. Netas and suits talked big, but the engineers were sidelined.

Flashy Targets That Don’t Add Up

When a company says “Net Zero by 2030” or “100% green energy,” it sounds amazing—too amazing. These loud goals often feel like stunts to grab headlines, not real plans. BP promised to be “carbon neutral” by 2050, but kept drilling oil, and in 2022, activists trashed their sustainability report online. In India, Adani Green Energy claims it’s the “world’s largest renewable company,” but critics in 2023 pointed out their coal business was still growing. Flashy targets with no clear “how” make people say, “Yeh toh bas drama hai” (This is just drama).

Tied to ESG—Making It Worse

ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) was supposed to help, but it’s become a problem. It mixes real green efforts with vague social and governance stuff, confusing everyone. Worse, it’s linked to scandals. Deutsche Bank’s DWS paid a $19 million fine in 2023 for fake ESG claims—their “green” funds weren’t green at all. In India, SEBI’s Business Responsibility Reporting (BSR) asks big firms to report on sustainability, but a 2022 study by Due Diligence Hub found many reports were full of holes. ESG drags down even the good efforts, making them look fake.

Greenwashing to Fool Buyers

Greenwashing is when companies slap “eco-friendly” labels on stuff to sell more, even if it’s a lie. Nestlé got caught for calling their bottled water “sustainable” while adding to plastic waste piles. In India, Patanjali sold “organic” products with big green claims, but in 2021, tests showed some had chemicals—hardly organic! Customers felt cheated and stopped trusting “green” tags. When sustainability is just a sales trick, people lose faith.

Funds Go Missing or Dry Up

Money for sustainability either gets “diverted” (a nice way to say siphoned off) or isn’t enough to begin with. Efforts start with a bang, then fizzle out like a damp squib. Globally, FIFA’s 2022 World Cup in Qatar promised a “carbon-neutral” event, but reports showed funds went more to PR than green work. In India, the Smart Cities Mission was supposed to make cities sustainable, but by 2023, many projects—like Bhubaneswar’s solar plans—were stuck due to cash shortages or “adjustments.” People said, “Paise gaye, plan gaya” (Money gone, plan gone).

Leaders Who Don’t Practice What They Preach

Nothing kills trust like hypocrisy. Leaders talk about climate change at big events, then live lives that scream the opposite. Al Gore, the famous climate guy, got called out years ago for his energy-hogging mansion. In India, politicians and CEOs preach “go green,” but drive SUVs and build huge homes. A 2022 report by Down To Earth caught a Maharashtra minister pushing solar power while his own office ran on diesel gensets. When leaders don’t walk the talk, people think, “Yeh toh double game hai” (This is a double game).

No Strict Rules to Catch Fakes

In many places, companies fake sustainability and get away with it. Weak rules mean no real punishment. In India, SEBI’s BSR is mandatory, but the data’s often dodgy—companies fudge numbers, and no one checks. Globally, a 2021 European Commission study found 42% of green claims were fake or exaggerated. But with a Republican administration in the US (post-2024), heavy ESG rules might ease up. Trump’s old EPA cut Obama-era regs, and a new shift could let firms focus on real environmental work, not fake reports. Fingers crossed!

Ignoring Workers and Locals

Sustainability plans often forget the people who matter—factory workers or villagers nearby. It’s all top-down, no input from below. Coca-Cola faced protests in Kerala for years over water depletion—their reports claimed “water positivity,” but locals said their wells were dry. In Tamil Nadu, Vedanta’s Sterlite plant promised “sustainable growth” in their reports, but pollution sparked riots in 2018, killing 13 people. When efforts don’t match ground reality, it’s a laughing stock.

Too Much Jargon, Too Little Sense

Open a sustainability report—words like “synergy,” “holistic,” or “paradigm shift” jump out. It’s nonsense to hide that nothing’s happening. People read it, shrug, and say, “Kuch samajh nahi aaya” (Didn’t understand a thing).

---

Indian Goof-Ups That Made It Worse

India’s had its share of sustainability mess-ups:

• Reliance Jio: They pushed “green telecom” with solar towers, but a 2021 audit showed many ran on diesel. Netizens trolled them, saying, “Green on paper, black in reality.”
• Delhi’s Odd-Even Scheme: Launched in 2016 to cut pollution, it was hyped as a sustainability win. But studies (IIT Delhi, 2018) showed little impact—people just bought more cars. It became a joke: “Pollution kam nahi, drama zyada.”
• Ganga Cleaning: The Namami Gange project got billions since 2014 to clean the river, but by 2023, CAG reports said sewage still flowed in. Politicians posed for pics, but the river stayed dirty—people called it “photo-op sustainability.”

---

Fact-Checking the Mess

The problems are real, and evidence backs them up:

• Greenwashing: H&M’s 96% fake claims (2021) and Patanjali’s chemical-laced “organic” stuff (2021) show it’s everywhere.
• ESG Trouble: DWS’s $19 million fine (2023) and India’s shaky BSR reports (2022) prove ESG can derail trust.
• US Shift: Trump’s EPA rolled back rules before, and a Republican win in 2024 could lighten ESG pressure, letting firms focus on practical green steps. Lee Zeldin the new EPA Cheif is set to run riots. (Oh Yes !his appointment, is one of few welcomed by everyone!).
• Mismatch with Values: Volkswagen’s Dieselgate (2015) and Vedanta’s Sterlite fiasco (2018) were caught out—both became global and local punchlines.

---

What’s the Way Forward?

Sustainability’s become a corporate drama because of fake promises, wrong leaders, and no accountability. But if rules loosen up—like maybe in the US with less ESG noise—companies could stop the circus and do real work. Engineers, not suits, need to lead. Call out the fakes, push practical steps, and maybe, just maybe, sustainability can stop being a joke and start adding value.

Karthik

20/3/25

#258

Context:- I’ve been losing sleep over something I see everywhere: a rampant “check the box” attitude taking root in organizations, not just in safety but across the board—operations, quality, you name it. It’s not apathy that scares me most; it’s this half-hearted compliance that’s more dangerous than doing nothing at all. Why? Because it’s a false positive—a shiny veneer of “all good” that hides ticking time bombs. On July 6, 1988, the Piper Alpha oil platform proved this in the worst way possible, erupting into flames and claiming 167 lives. So, let’s dive into what went wrong, why this keeps happening, and how we can stop it before the next explosion—literal or figurative.

Introduction: The Explosion That Shook the World

On July 6, 1988, the Piper Alpha oil platform in the North Sea turned into a fireball, claiming 167 lives in one of the deadliest industrial disasters ever. The culprit? Not just a leaky valve or a bad spark—but a pervasive “check the box” mentality that masked real dangers with a façade of compliance. It’s a chilling reminder that ticking boxes can be riskier than being outright unsafe. So, what went wrong, why does this happen, and how can organizations stop this ticking time bomb? Let’s unpack it with Piper Alpha as our wake-up call.

Piper Alpha: A Case Study in Box-Checking Chaos

Picture this: a pressure safety valve is pulled for maintenance, but the night shift isn’t told it’s offline. They flip the switch on a pump, gas leaks, and boom—the platform’s toast. Sounds like a simple screw-up, right? Dig deeper. The permit-to-work system was a mess—permits signed off without checks, left in random spots, not reviewed at shift change. Maintenance and operations barely talked. Why? Because the goal was to look safe on paper, not be safe in reality. Occidental Petroleum, the operator, had audits that waved through this sham, all while production hummed along. The result? A disaster that could’ve been stopped if anyone cared beyond the checklist.

Why “Checking the Box” Happens

This isn’t just a Piper Alpha problem—it’s a human one. People rush to meet quotas, dodge blame, or just survive the daily grind. When the boss only asks, “Is it done?” and not “Is it right?”—you get box-checking. It’s complacency dressed up as efficiency. At Piper Alpha, pressure to keep oil flowing trumped safety. Workers didn’t speak up, fearing pushback, and leaders didn’t dig deeper, trusting the paperwork. It’s a vicious cycle: no trust, no real action, just ink on a page.

The Root Causes: A Culture Crash

• No Trust: Workers didn’t trust management to back them if they flagged issues—think of the safety rep who got axed for pointing out a hazard pre-disaster.
• Zero Empowerment: Employees had no say; they followed orders, not instincts. The night crew didn’t question the pump restart because they weren’t empowered to.
• Fake Accountability: Accountability was a signature, not a mindset. No one owned the outcome, just the process.

Add in a dash of misaligned motivation—production over safety—and you’ve got a recipe for ruin. Workers lacked autonomy to act, mastery to understand the stakes, and purpose to care beyond their shift.

Flipping the Script: Culture and Motivation as the Fix

Organizations can snuff out this trend before it’s too late, and it starts with culture and motivation. Here’s how Trust, Empowerment, and Accountability, paired with Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose, can turn box-checkers into safety champs:

1. Build Trust (Purpose)
   • What It Does: When workers trust leaders have their back, they’ll raise red flags without fear. Purpose kicks in—they’re not just clocking in; they’re protecting lives.
   • How: Open-door policies, no-blame reporting, and leaders who listen. Post-Piper Alpha, firms like Shell started “safety moments” at meetings—small wins that built trust big-time.
2. Empower Employees (Autonomy)
   • What It Does: Give workers the reins to stop a job if it smells off. Autonomy fuels ownership—no one at Piper Alpha felt they could hit pause.
   • How: Train them to spot risks, not just follow scripts. Let them tweak processes. BP’s post-Deepwater Horizon push for worker-led safety calls is a solid playbook.
3. Demand Real Accountability (Mastery)
   • What It Does: Tie accountability to outcomes—did it work, not just “was it done?” Mastery grows when people know their craft matters.
   • How: Ditch superficial audits for deep dives. Reward hazard fixes, not form-filling. The UK’s Safety Case regime after Piper Alpha forced companies to prove safety, not just claim it.

Spotting and Stopping the Trend

• Identify It: Look for rushed sign-offs, silent workers, or “too perfect” reports. Piper Alpha’s permits screamed “good enough” when they weren’t.
• Act Fast: Regular walkabouts, not desk reviews. Chat with the frontline—do they feel heard? Test systems with real drills, not hypotheticals.
• Motivate Right: Link bonuses to safety wins, not output. Celebrate a caught risk like a production record. Purpose over paycheck keeps eyes sharp.

Conclusion: From Ashes to Action

Piper Alpha wasn’t just a failure of pipes—it was a failure of people trapped in a “check the box” culture. But it’s not destiny. By weaving Trust, Empowerment, and Accountability into the fabric of an organization, and igniting Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose in every worker, we can turn complacency into vigilance. Let’s not wait for the next explosion to care—start now, because safety’s not a box to tick, it’s a life to save.

Karthik

17th March 2025 1330 Hrs.

#257

Ever wonder why some EHS disasters feel like they were scripted by overconfident rookies? Meet the Dunning-Kruger effect—where folks with just a smidge of know-how strut around like experts, putting safety and progress in the crosshairs. In manufacturing and operational excellence, this isn’t just a quirky brain glitch—it’s a silent killer. Let’s unpack why it’s so common, look at where it’s gone wrong, and figure out how to turn it around.

Why Dunning-Kruger Loves Manufacturing

Picture this: a machine operator who’s skimmed a safety manual decides they’re ready to tweak a process. They skip the lockout-tagout because “it’s fine, I’ve done this before.” That’s Dunning-Kruger in a nutshell—overconfidence born from not knowing what they don’t know. In industries like manufacturing, where systems are complex and stakes are high, this happens way too often. A little training can make someone feel invincible, even when they’re nowhere near competent.

Then there’s the culture trap. Many plants run on a “don’t rock the boat” vibe. Power distance—think workers scared to question a supervisor—means shaky ideas sail through unchallenged. Tight deadlines and production quotas only juice it up, rewarding “get it done” over “get it right.” And the saddest part? Some folks dig in when they’re wrong. Pride or laziness kicks in, and they’d rather double down than learn. In EHS, where risks shift daily—new chemicals, upgraded gear—that unwillingness to adapt is a ticking bomb.

Where It’s Derailed Progress

Let’s look at some real (and inspired) messes where Dunning-Kruger played a starring role:

• BP Texas City Refinery Explosion (2005)
  Operators and managers thought they had an aging refinery under control. Overfilled towers? No biggie—they’d seen worse. Except they hadn’t. Basic training didn’t match the complexity, and a culture of cost-cutting over safety audits let overconfidence run wild. The result? 15 lives lost, 180 injured, and a brutal wake-up call.
• The “Safety Guy” Near-Miss
  Imagine a junior EHS coordinator at a factory, fresh off a week-long cert course. He’s pumped to “optimize” chemical storage—moves flammable stuff near a heat source because “how hard can it be?” No one questions him; he’s “the safety guy.” Next day, a near-miss fire shuts down the line. Progress stalls, risks spike, and trust takes a hit—all because a little knowledge met zero pushback.

Turning It Around

So how do we stop Dunning-Kruger from tanking EHS and ops excellence? Here’s the playbook:

• Make Questioning Cool: Build a culture where “What don’t we know?” is everyone’s go-to. Safety huddles where anyone can speak up—floor worker or boss—cut through the swagger. Next time someone’s rushing a fix with a cocky grin, ask: “Are we sure—or are we just climbing Mount Stupid?”
• Close the Power Gap: Flatten the hierarchy a bit. Anonymous reporting tools or cross-rank workshops let workers call out bad moves without fear. If a newbie can challenge a supervisor’s risky plan, you’re winning.
• Force the Learning Habit: Kill “I know enough” dead. Roll out hands-on EHS training that never stops—tie it to real hazards, not just slideshows. Make it clear: learning’s not optional, it’s how we survive.
• Catch the Overconfident Early: Use drills—hazard recognition, skills tests—to spot folks who think they’re pros but aren’t. Pair them with grizzled mentors who’ve seen the trenches. Feedback’s gotta sting a little but build them up.
• Reward the Right Stuff: Praise the ones who say, “I need help” or “Let’s double-check,” not just the loudest “I’ve got this” voices. Tie bonuses to safety wins and solid processes, not just output numbers.

The Takeaway

The Dunning-Kruger effect isn’t just a fun psych fact—it’s a real threat in EHS and manufacturing. When low-skill confidence meets a culture that doesn’t push back, risks pile up and progress craters. But it’s fixable. Start asking the hard questions, keep learning, and reward humility over bravado. Because in this game, overconfidence doesn’t just bruise egos—it breaks lives. What’s your next step to keep it out of your shop?

Karthik

16/3/25 1130am.

#256

Hey folks, I’ve been asked time and again, “How do you become a good, practical leader?” Having been a manager for 12 years before switching to consulting in 2012, I’ve picked up a few tricks that worked for me. Leadership isn’t about fancy degrees or corner offices—it’s about connecting, guiding, and getting stuff done, especially in our chaotic Indian workplaces. So, here are my 10 mantras to be a hands-on, kickass leader. Customise them your way, but trust me, they deliver!

---

1. Know Your People, Beyond the 9-to-5

A leader who only talks shop is a robot, not a human. Get to know your team—ask about their kid’s dance recital, their love for IPL, or how their mom’s doing after that surgery. In India, family and chai-time chats are everything. When your team sees you care about their Diwali plans, not just deadlines, they’ll stick by you. Bonding pays dividends—try it!

---

2. The 30-Minute Catch-Up: Your Secret Weapon

Schedule a one-on-one with each team member every two weeks—30 minutes, no less. Split it like this: 10 minutes for their headaches (work or personal), 10 for your expectations (“I need this report by Friday”), and 10 to plan the way forward. It’s like a mini roadmap—keeps everyone on the same page, no confusion. In our top-down Indian setups, this is gold.

---

3. Be Human, Not a Superhero

Show a little chink in your armour, yaar. Admit when you goof up: “Arre, I forgot to send that mail, my bad!” It’s not weakness—it’s proof you’re not some unreachable boss on a pedestal. In India, we love our heroes flawed—think Shah Rukh in a romcom. Let your team see you’re real, and they won’t be scared to approach you.

---

4. Communication Rules: No News is Bad News

Set this straight: “If something’s brewing, tell me ASAP. Bad news first, always.” Updates have deadlines—don’t let silence fester. Praise loudly—“Shabash, Anil, killer presentation!”—but if someone messes up, pull them aside for a quiet word. In our last-minute Indian chaos, clear communication is your lifeline.

---

5. Let Your Team Take the Spotlight

Don’t jump in to tweak every idea—let your team shine. If they’ve cracked a problem, say, “This is all you, well done!” Step in only if you’ve got a game-changer up your sleeve, like a new safety rule that saves the day. In India, where credit is a big deal, this builds a team that’s confident, not cowed.

---

6. Trust Your Gut When It Counts

Your experience is your ace card. A good team rarely needs rescuing, but when they’re stuck—like on a tricky EHS compliance issue—your intuition kicks in. It’s like being the captain who knows when to switch bowlers. Keep a Plan B ready, but don’t flash it unless needed. They’ll respect you as the quiet fixer.

---

7. Be Different, Be You

Stand out from the crowd, Karthik-style. My thing? Delegation—I’d tell my team, “Take as much as you can handle, I trust you.” No breathing down necks, no micromanaging. In India, where bosses often hover, this freedom is rare. Bring your unique vibe—maybe it’s your calm in a storm or your knack for cutting through red tape.

---

8. Empathy: The Real Deal

Stuff will hit the fan—projects will delay, someone’s kid will fall sick. Don’t flip out. Say, “Relax, we’ll sort this.” Understand their pressures: “I get it, exams are tough on the family.” Empathy isn’t mollycoddling—it’s knowing life isn’t perfect. Your team will fight harder for a boss who’s human, not a taskmaster.

---

9. Don’t Hoard Info—Pass It On

Great leaders don’t sit on emails or files like they’re gold. If something lands with you, forward it—“Team, FYI” or “Act on this by EOD.” In India, where bureaucracy can choke progress, this speed is a superpower. I learned this from bosses who never let paper pile up—it’s a habit that keeps the wheels turning, at work and home.

---

10. Have Your Team’s Back, Always

This is the golden rule: their wins are theirs, your flops are yours. If they ace a project, shout, “My rockstars did this!” If it tanks, take the heat: “I should’ve steered better.” Defend them like a lion—against clients, upper management, anyone. In India, loyalty is king, and this builds a team that’ll follow you to the ends of the earth.

---

There you have it, folks—10 mantras to lead with guts, heart, and a bit of desi swagger. Leadership isn’t rocket science; it’s about trust, clarity, and standing tall for your people. Try these out, tweak them to your style, and watch your team thrive. What’s your take? Drop a comment—I’d love to hear your stories!

Karthik

14/3/25 1030am.

#255

Dr Robert Long, Australia; who is pioneer on Social Psycology of Risk & Safety.

This Dr Long’s Safety blog post lead me to think and share my experience, almost similar!!

In my 12 years as an Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) consultant in India, I’ve encountered workplace patterns that resonate with the insights of safety experts like Dr. Robert Long, an Australian veteran known for blending psychological safety and social psychology into risk management. Too often, organisations hire consultants expecting us to magically resolve deep-seated issues like a toxic safety culture. Yet, as I’ve observed—and as thought leaders in this space often point out—many companies seek solutions at the same level where problems originate, relying on repetitive initiatives, slogans, and grand promises, without stepping back for a holistic view. This blog explores key indicators of a toxic safety culture, drawing from my experiences in India and reflecting challenges that seem universal, cutting across industries and nations.

What is a Toxic Safety Culture?

A toxic safety culture isn’t just about missing safety protocols—it’s a systemic breakdown where organisational behaviours, values, and practices undermine safety and well-being. Experts in safety psychology argue that such cultures thrive when employees can’t speak freely, and dynamics like power imbalances or unaccountability take root. In my consulting journey, I’ve seen this play out in Indian workplaces where safety becomes a compliance ritual rather than a core value.

Key Indicators of a Toxic Safety Culture

Here are the standout signs I’ve identified over the years, echoing broader concerns in the safety field:

1. Lack of Transparency
   Transparency is crucial for any safety culture, yet many organisations hide incidents or data to maintain an illusion of control. In a Gujarat manufacturing unit, a near-miss with a conveyor belt was hushed up to “keep morale high.” Workers remained in the dark, and no improvements followed. This opacity breeds distrust, a point safety thought leaders often highlight.
2. High Power Distance
   In India’s often hierarchical workplaces, the gap between leaders and workers can silence critical feedback. At a Maharashtra steel plant, shop floor staff hesitated to flag unsafe machinery, fearing management wouldn’t care. This power distance—a widely recognised barrier—stifles open dialogue and weakens safety efforts.
3. Limited Empowerment and Involvement
   Excluding employees from decision-making is a glaring red flag. In a Tamil Nadu chemical factory, safety procedures were drafted by outsiders without worker input, rendering them impractical and ignored. Safety experts stress that empowering employees fosters ownership, yet this is frequently overlooked.
4. Absence of Accountability
   When accountability falters, blame often shifts downward. In a construction project, a supervisor pinned an accident on workers, dodging scrutiny of inadequate training. This misdirection—a common critique in safety discourse—fuels resentment and disengagement.
5. Focus on Symptoms, Not Root Causes
   Many organisations treat safety like a quick fix, targeting symptoms without digging deeper. A Punjab textile mill tackled absenteeism as “laziness,” ignoring poor ventilation and fatigue. Safety thinkers warn that this shortsightedness perpetuates issues, masking the real drivers.
6. Obsession with Zero Harm
   The “Zero Harm” goal, championed by some big-name consultancies, can distort reality. In a Karnataka refinery, pressure to show zero incidents led to underreporting, not improvement. Critics in the field argue this creates a superficial safety veneer while problems simmer beneath.
7. Disengaged Workforce
   Low motivation and absenteeism signal deeper trouble. In a Hyderabad pharma plant, workers skipped safety drills, feeling their suggestions were pointless. This disengagement often ties back to a culture where voices aren’t valued—a recurring theme in safety psychology.

Case Examples: A Mirror to Reality

• The Consultancy Trap: A large Indian PSU enlisted a globally hyped consultancy for a safety overhaul. The outcome? Slick campaigns and metrics that faded once the consultants left, with no real drop in incidents—just in reporting. This echoes warnings about fleeting, surface-level interventions.
• The Silent Shop Floor: In an auto parts factory, fear of reprisal kept workers quiet about hazards. A machine malfunction injured someone, yet “human error” took the blame over systemic flaws—a textbook sign of cultural toxicity.

The Global Echo

What’s striking is how these indicators transcend borders. My observations in India align with challenges safety experts note worldwide—whether in Australia, India, or beyond. Organisations chase the prestige of big-name consultants, throwing resources at quick fixes, only to see no lasting change. The obsession with metrics like Zero Harm often sweeps issues under the rug, leaving operational excellence—balancing safety, efficiency, and employee well-being—out of reach.

Conclusion

A toxic safety culture, marked by opacity, power gaps, and a symptom-only focus, is a pervasive challenge. My 12 years in India’s EHS landscape reveal a struggle that’s not unique but shared globally. Companies must move beyond viewing consultants as miracle workers and commit to introspection, employee involvement, and tackling root causes. Safety isn’t a slogan—it’s a sustained effort.

So Folks, what’s your take—have you seen these signs in your own workplace?

Karthik

10th March 2025

12Noon.

#254

Understanding the Divide: General EHS vs. Process Safety Management (PSM)

In the world of workplace safety, two terms often get tangled up, even among seasoned EHS professionals: General Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) and Process Safety Management (PSM). While both aim to protect people, the environment, and assets, they differ significantly in scope, intent, and application. Misunderstanding these differences can lead to wasted time, misdirected resources, and, in some cases, an “overkill” approach that dilutes focus on what truly matters. Let’s break it down, dispel the myths, and clarify where each fits in your facility—because handling a hazardous substance doesn’t automatically mean you’re in PSM territory.

---

What is General EHS?

General EHS is the broad umbrella under which we ensure the physical safety and well-being of people, protect the environment, and comply with regulations that apply to everyday operations. It’s about preventing slips, trips, falls, ergonomic injuries, air and water pollution, and ensuring a workplace that doesn’t harm employees or the surrounding community.

• Scope: Day-to-day hazards affecting individuals or small groups—think personal protective equipment (PPE), fire safety, waste disposal, noise control, and air quality.
• Examples: A worker slips on a wet floor (physical safety), a factory releases untreated effluent into a river (environmental), or an employee suffers hearing loss from prolonged exposure to loud machinery (health).
• Regulations: In India, this might fall under the Factories Act, 1948, or the Environment Protection Act, 1986—broad laws that apply to most industries.

EHS is foundational. It’s the bedrock of safety culture in any organization, ensuring compliance with general standards and keeping the workforce safe from routine risks.

---

What is Process Safety Management (PSM)?

PSM, on the other hand, is a specialized framework designed to prevent catastrophic events involving highly hazardous chemicals—events that could kill scores of people, devastate the environment, and leave a legacy of irrecoverable damage. It’s not about the everyday; it’s about the extraordinary risks posed by specific processes and substances.

• Scope: Focuses on mitigating risks from processes involving threshold quantities of hazardous chemicals that could lead to explosions, toxic releases, or fires. Think large-scale disasters, not individual injuries.
• Examples: The Bhopal gas tragedy (1984), where a methyl isocyanate leak killed thousands; the Texas City refinery explosion (2005), which claimed 15 lives; or the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (2010), which caused massive environmental contamination.
• Regulations: In the U.S., PSM is governed by OSHA’s 29 CFR 1910.119, which lists specific chemicals (e.g., chlorine, ammonia) and their threshold quantities. In India, PSM isn’t as explicitly codified, but elements are drawn from the MSIHC Rules, Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness, and Response) Rules, 1996, and international standards like those from the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE).

PSM is about systemic risk. It’s a proactive, engineering-driven approach to ensure that a single failure doesn’t cascade into a disaster.

---

Key Differences: EHS vs. PSM

Aspect	General EHS	Process Safety Management (PSM)
Focus	People, environment, routine hazards	Catastrophic process-related risks
Scale of Impact	Individual or localized	Large-scale, potentially regional/global
Examples	Slips, falls, minor spills	Explosions, toxic releases, major fires
Regulation	Broad laws (e.g., Factories Act in India)	Specific to hazardous chemicals (e.g., OSHA PSM list)
Tools	PPE, training, housekeeping	Process hazard analysis (PHA), mechanical integrity checks

---

The Confusion: Why Even EHS Pros Get It Wrong

Despite these clear distinctions, I’ve seen EHS professionals—and organizations—blur the lines. In India, where PSM-specific regulations are less defined than in the U.S. or Europe, this confusion often leads to overreach. Here’s where the misconceptions creep in:

1. “We Handle Substance X, So PSM Applies!”
   Not quite. PSM isn’t triggered just because you use a chemical. It applies only to listed hazardous chemicals above a threshold quantity in a process. For example, OSHA lists chlorine with a threshold of 1,500 pounds (680 kg). If your facility uses 100 kg of chlorine in a cooling system, PSM doesn’t apply—but general EHS controls (like proper storage and PPE) do.
2. Extending PSM to Utilities Like Boilers and Compressors
   Boilers and compressors pose risks, sure—explosions or pressure failures can be deadly. But unless they’re part of a process handling a PSM-covered chemical above the threshold, they fall under general EHS or equipment safety standards (e.g., the Indian Boiler Regulations, 1950), not PSM. Applying PSM’s rigorous documentation and auditing to these utilities is overkill and saps focus from actual PSM risks.
3. Reporting Every Incident as a “PSM Incident”
   A minor spill of a non-listed substance or a small compressor leak doesn’t qualify as a PSM incident. PSM events are tied to catastrophic potential—think Bhopal, not a puddle on the floor. Yet, I’ve seen facilities in India mandate PSM-level investigations for trivial events, bogging down teams with unnecessary paperwork.

This over-application sucks time, energy, and resources. It’s like using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut—inefficient and distracting from real priorities.

---

Real-World Examples to Clarify

• Scenario 1: Ammonia in a Refrigeration Unit
  A food processing plant uses 200 kg of ammonia for cooling. OSHA’s PSM threshold for ammonia is 10,000 pounds (4,536 kg). This plant is well below that, so PSM doesn’t apply. However, general EHS requires safe handling, leak detection, and worker training to prevent inhalation risks. Misapplying PSM here would mean pointless process hazard analyses (PHAs) instead of focusing on practical EHS controls.
• Scenario 2: Chlorine at a Water Treatment Facility
  A facility stores 1,000 kg of chlorine—above OSHA’s 680 kg threshold. Here, PSM kicks in: PHAs, mechanical integrity checks, and emergency planning are mandatory to prevent a toxic cloud disaster. General EHS still applies (e.g., PPE for workers), but PSM takes precedence for the process risk.
• Scenario 3: Boiler Explosion Risk
  A textile factory’s boiler fails, injuring two workers. This is a serious EHS incident—investigate equipment maintenance, training, and safety valves. But unless that boiler is tied to a PSM-listed chemical process, it’s not a PSM issue. Labeling it as such wastes effort on irrelevant compliance steps.

---

The Indian Context: Bridging the Gap Without Overkill

In India, the lack of a standalone PSM regulation (unlike OSHA’s clear framework) fuels this confusion. Many organizations adopt PSM principles voluntarily, often inspired by global standards or multinational parent companies. That’s commendable—but it’s critical to apply PSM only where it’s warranted. Overextending it to every chemical, utility, or incident dilutes its purpose and overwhelms teams.

• Tip 1: Check your inventory against a PSM chemical list (e.g., OSHA’s or the EU’s Seveso Directive or MSIHC rules Annexures). No match? Stick to EHS.
• Tip 2: For utilities like boilers or compressors, use equipment-specific codes (e.g., IBR) rather than PSM frameworks.
• Tip 3: Train your team to distinguish routine EHS incidents from PSM-level near-misses. A chemical spill isn’t PSM unless it’s tied to a listed substance and process.

---

Conclusion: Focus Where It Counts

General EHS and PSM aren’t interchangeable. EHS keeps your people and environment safe from daily risks; PSM prevents rare but devastating process failures. Handling “Substance X” doesn’t automatically mean PSM applies—check the list, check the quantity, and check the process. Misapplying PSM doesn’t make you safer; it makes you inefficient. By understanding these boundaries, you can sharpen your facility’s safety focus, save resources, and—most importantly—protect what matters most.

Let’s stop the overkill and start getting it right.

Karthik

8th March 2025

1130am.

#253

The world of environmental, health, and safety (EHS) regulation is at a crossroads. Agencies like the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), alongside India’s Factory Inspectorate, Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), and State Pollution Control Boards (SPCBs), have been guardians of safety and sustainability for nearly 60 years. Born in an era of smokestacks and assembly lines, these bodies now face a vastly different landscape—global supply chains, AI-driven manufacturing, and an unprecedented growth boom. Yet, their frameworks remain stuck in the past, policing industries rather than partnering with them. It’s time for a radical overhaul: an infusion of fresh talent, cutting-edge technology, and a mindset shift to align with 2025’s realities. Without it, we risk chaos as the world races forward.

---

The Aging Framework: 60 Years and Counting

The EPA and OSHA were established in 1970, while India’s Factory Inspectorate and pollution control boards took shape around the same time. These agencies were designed to tackle the industrial challenges of their day—basic workplace safety, air and water pollution, and factory oversight. Fast forward to 2025, and the game has changed. Industries now grapple with automation risks, remote work, and sprawling urban-industrial zones. Yet, many regulators still rely on outdated processes—paper-based audits, infrequent inspections, and one-size-fits-all rules.

Take OSHA: its standards struggle to address wearable tech or robotic hazards. In India, the CPCB lacks real-time tools to monitor pollution across vast regions. These agencies need more than a facelift—they need a reboot. That starts with hiring tech-savvy professionals and equipping them with tools like AI, IoT, and data analytics to match the pace of modern industry.

---

From Policemen to Partners

For too long, EHS agencies have acted like policemen, hunting for violations rather than fostering compliance. This adversarial approach ignores a key truth: 90% of companies invest heavily in talent, innovation, and good intent. They want to do well—unless proven otherwise. Regulators should respect this effort, offering guidance instead of instant penalties.

Consider a factory hit by a supply chain glitch, causing a temporary compliance dip. Today, it’s branded a “bad example,” even if its track record is solid. This knee-jerk reaction kills trust and collaboration. Agencies must shift gears—presume good faith, support companies through challenges, and reserve the hammer for willful negligence. Partnership, not punishment, is the way forward.

---

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Tailored Regulation

A food processing plant isn’t an explosives factory—yet regulators often wield the same yardstick for both. This blanket approach burdens low-risk sectors with red tape while failing to adequately scrutinize high-risk ones. Critical industries (e.g., chemicals) differ from non-critical ones (e.g., textiles); hazardous “red” categories aren’t the same as “green” renewables. It’s time for nuance.

Imagine a risk-based system: green industries get streamlined oversight with incentives, orange ones face balanced checks, and red ones get rigorous, real-time monitoring. Data can drive this—categorizing sectors by impact and tailoring resources accordingly. This ensures regulators focus where it matters most, rather than painting all industries with the same brush.

---

Third-Party Validation and Raising the Bar

Compliance audits should be a gold standard, not a formality. Too often, I’ve seen “competent persons” breeze through sites, ticking boxes or cracking jokes instead of digging deep. This undermines safety and erodes trust. Agencies must mandate independent, third-party validations—conducted by truly competent experts.

What does “competent” mean? Certified professionals with proven experience, held accountable for their assessments—not just hired hands. Regulators should set a high bar, integrating these findings into a transparent system. No more check-the-box farce—real scrutiny drives real results.

---

Clear Expectations: A Four-Pillar Framework

If agencies want industries to step up, they must set clear, actionable rules. Here’s a four-pillar framework to make it happen:

1. Set Standards: Define rules for keeping employees and facilities safe and clean—specific, practical, and enforceable.
2. Build Competence: Mandate training and awareness programs to meet those norms, ensuring every worker knows the drill.
3. Regular Assurance: Require annual or biannual compliance programs, verified by data or audits—no shortcuts allowed.
4. Accountability: Hold leaders personally liable for execution, with consequences for negligence. If a manager skips safety drills, they feel the heat.

This shifts responsibility to companies while giving them clarity. Pair it with 2025’s tech—smart sensors, AI dashboards, software trackers—and compliance becomes a discipline, not a chore.

---

Technology as the Great Enabler

Modernization isn’t just about people—it’s about tools. Automation, AI, and smart devices are transforming EHS. Imagine CPCB using satellite data to pinpoint pollution hotspots, or OSHA deploying wearables to monitor worker fatigue in real time. Blockchain could track supply chain emissions, while AI predicts risks before they escalate.

These aren’t dreams—they’re here. Agencies and industries must adopt them to cut errors, boost efficiency, and prepare for what’s coming. Technology isn’t a luxury; it’s the backbone of a future-ready EHS system.

---

The Cost of Inaction

The stakes couldn’t be higher. Global growth is surging—India alone is industrializing at a dizzying pace. Without modernized regulators, we’re courting disaster. Unchecked pollution, workplace accidents, and compliance scandals could spiral out of control. The 2020 Vizag gas leak in India, which killed 11 and injured hundreds, exposed glaring oversight gaps. Predictive tech and proactive agencies could’ve stopped it.

If governments and regulators don’t plan now, they’ll miss the bus. The growth boom won’t wait—and the mess will be theirs to clean up.

---

Parting Thoughts:-

The EPA, OSHA, Factory Inspectorate, CPCB, and SPCBs have served us well for 60 years—but their time for transformation is now. Infuse them with talent, tech, and a partnership ethos. Tailor regulations to risk, enforce rigorous third-party audits, and set clear, accountable standards for industry. By 2025, a revamped EHS ecosystem can deliver safer workplaces, cleaner environments, and thriving businesses—no mayhem required.

Governments, regulators, and companies must act together. The clock’s ticking—let’s not be left behind.

Karthik

7th March 2025

10am.

#252

As we navigate 2025, the demands of professional life continue to grow, placing immense pressure on our physical and mental well-being. Workplace stress, long hours, and erratic schedules are taking a toll on our bodies, making it imperative to reassess our lifestyle choices. The cornerstone of good health? The food we eat.

A sound body is crucial for managing workplace stress, cognitive function, and emotional resilience. Yet, modern dietary habits are working against us. An alarming cover story from India Today highlights the rising epidemic of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in India. With 3 out of 10 adults and children affected, it’s no longer just a concern for the overweight or alcohol consumers. Poor dietary choices, stress, and lifestyle factors are silently damaging our livers, and by extension, our overall health.

The Four Pillars of a Healthy Lifestyle in 2025

1. Prioritising Healthy Eating Habits

• Eat natural, unprocessed foods. The best meals come from home-cooked, whole ingredients. Fresh vegetables, lean proteins, whole grains, and nuts should form the core of your diet.
• Mind your meal timings. Late-night eating disrupts digestion and sleep patterns. Try to have dinner at least 2-3 hours before bedtime.
• Hydration is key. Drinking sufficient water, especially before meals, aids digestion and prevents overeating.
• Traditional wisdom still holds value. Practices like starting meals with a glass of water and a bowl of raw salad can prevent overeating and aid metabolism.

2. Avoiding Ultra-Processed Foods

• Read food labels carefully. Anything in a packet with complex, unrecognizable ingredients is best avoided.
• Say no to instant foods. Packaged noodles, chips, processed meats, and bakery items are loaded with unhealthy fats, preservatives, and sugar.
• Cut down on sugar. Excess sugar is a silent killer, increasing the risk of fatty liver, diabetes, and metabolic disorders.
• Choose healthy fats. Replace refined oils with cold-pressed or traditional oils like mustard, coconut, or olive oil.

3. Managing Stress for a Healthy Body

• Practice mindfulness and relaxation techniques. Stress leads to unhealthy eating, hormonal imbalances, and digestive issues.
• Engage in physical activity. A simple 30-minute daily walk can significantly reduce stress and improve metabolic health.
• Connect socially. Loneliness and stress often lead to emotional eating. Cultivating relationships and hobbies can be a game changer.

4. Quality Sleep – The Forgotten Pillar of Health

• Ensure 7-8 hours of uninterrupted sleep. Sleep is the body’s natural repair mechanism.
• Reduce screen time before bed. The blue light from gadgets disrupts melatonin production, affecting sleep quality.
• Create a sleep-friendly environment. A cool, dark, and quiet room promotes deeper sleep cycles.
• No caffeine after 5 PM. Stimulants like coffee and tea interfere with restful sleep.

The Rising Epidemic: What NAFLD Teaches Us

The statistics from India Today are alarming—NAFLD is no longer an isolated concern. Factors like central obesity, insulin resistance, and high carbohydrate consumption have made Indians particularly vulnerable. Interestingly, 10-15% of NAFLD patients are lean, indicating that weight alone is not a determining factor; dietary habits and metabolic health matter more.

While there is no direct medication for fatty liver, the solution is simple: lifestyle changes. A mere 10% reduction in body weight can significantly improve liver health. This brings us back to the fundamentals—what we eat, how we eat, and how we manage our daily stressors.

A Call to Action for Professionals

With workplace stress at an all-time high, professionals must take charge of their health. By making small but consistent changes—choosing home-cooked meals over takeout, opting for mindful eating, and prioritising rest—we can build resilience against modern health challenges.

In 2025, life is tough, but with the right food and lifestyle adjustments, we can navigate it with a healthy body, a clear mind, and a balanced emotional state. Let’s make food our ally in achieving holistic well-being.

Karthik

4/3/25

130pm.